The choice by the Federal Authorities to limit media protection for the trial of the chief of the Indigenous Individuals of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, raises some essential questions concerning the authorities’s openness, JESUSEGUN ALAGBE writes
Being a democracy, Nigeria’s justice system rests on a number of necessary ideas, together with the precept of open justice.
The precept, in accordance with analysts, performed an necessary half in marking the nation’s historic transition from a repressive navy regime dotted by tyranny and secrecy to a democratic state based on the values of accountability, responsiveness, and openness.
In a democracy, open justice is the precept that the doorways of all of the courts within the nation have to be open to the general public and the press.
Openness signifies that the general public typically has an curiosity in figuring out about issues of significance, such because the arguments in and outcomes of trials.
This precept dates again to centuries and ensures equity and confidence in the entire justice system. Open justice signifies that justice isn’t solely executed, however seen to be executed.
In the meantime, there’s one other precept of justice that an accused particular person has the appropriate to know the case towards them in order that they’ll adequately put together a defence.
That is generally often known as the ‘equality of arms’ precept – which means that each the particular person pursuing a declare and the particular person defending ought to have equal entry to the proof and arguments within the case.
Sadly, these ideas are usually not at all times utilized in apply – even in a democracy – as a result of the federal government generally claims that the reporting of a trial or the disclosure of data in public would put nationwide safety in danger, therefore the adoption of secrecy in sure trials.
Nonetheless, at any time when secrecy is launched, specialists fear that the ideas of openness and ‘equality of arms’ are jeopardised and that the accused might not at all times get a good trial, a violation of Article 10 of the Common Declaration of Human Rights, which Nigeria is a signatory to.
That is the rationale many Nigerians had been disturbed on Monday when the Federal Excessive Court docket, Abuja barred main media homes from protecting the trial of the chief of the outlawed Indigenous Individuals of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, on the court docket.
A number of studies said how journalists from media organisations together with The PUNCH, The Guardian, Every day Belief, Tribune, Every day Solar, TheCable, and Every day Occasions had been barred by officers of the Federal Excessive Court docket by way of a launch signed by its Chief Data Officer, Dr. Catherine Christopher from getting into the court docket on the grounds that they weren’t accredited to cowl the trial.
The media organisations that had been accredited are Vanguard, ThisDay, Premium Occasions, The Nation, Every day Impartial, The Herald, Nigeria Tv Authority, Tv Continental, African Impartial Tv, Channels Tv, Information Company of Nigeria, BBC, Come up Tv and FRCN.
The court docket didn’t give any causes for choosing solely 14 media homes whereas barring others from protecting Kanu’s trial.
Aside from the restriction of media protection, movies on social media additionally confirmed that a number of the IPOB chief’s attorneys had been denied entry to the courtroom.
“I understand that the federal government barred these seen as at all times essential of its actions,” An Abuja-based lawyer, Mr Godwin Uchechukwu, advised our correspondent on the telephone.
“Any trial that’s not completely open isn’t a good trial, and a regime that condones secret trial is an enemy of free press and a disgrace to democracy,” the lawyer added.
Kanu’s day in court docket
On June 27, after almost 4 years of leaping bail, Kanu was arrested and extradited to Nigeria from Kenya via the mixed efforts of the Nigerian intelligence operatives and the Worldwide Police, generally often known as Interpol.
For years in his sojourn in London, the UK, the place he’s additionally a citizen, Kanu – via social media and Radio Biafra – dished out alleged provocative utterances towards the Nigerian state, safety brokers, South-East leaders, and the President, Main Basic Muhammadu Buhari (retd).
Because the director of Radio Biafra, a registered radio station within the UK, Kanu propagated Biafran separatism, a motion aiming to revive a separatist state that when existed within the then Jap Area of Nigeria through the civil warfare of 1967-70.
The IPOB chief commanded his supporters to “sit at house” and boycott nationwide elections – directions they often obeyed.
IPOB supporters, completely Igbo, have at all times criticised the Federal Authorities for its poor funding, inequitable useful resource distribution, ethnic marginalisation, and heavy navy presence within the South-East.
Little doubt, the organisation, stated to be the biggest Biafran independence organisation by membership, has gained vital media consideration for turning into a frequent goal of crackdowns by the federal government.
IPOB members had launched into a number of protests, a few of which turned lethal up to now as they clashed with Nigeria safety brokers. The clashes between the IPOB members and safety brokers have reportedly led to a whole bunch of deaths and accidents of members from each events.
Kanu was first arrested in October 2015 and arraigned a month later at an Abuja Justice of the Peace’s Court docket for prices of felony conspiracy, intimidation and membership of an unlawful organisation – prices the Division of State Companies stated violated sections 97, 97B and 397 of the Penal Code. He was granted bail in 2017 and launched on well being grounds.
However after then, the IPOB chief failed to look in court docket to reply to the costs towards him by the Federal Authorities. He reportedly disappeared in September 2017 after a premeditated assault on his house village in Umuahia by the navy, and later alleged via a Radio Biafra broadcast that his disappearance was as a result of the federal government on the centre allegedly despatched the navy to “execute” him in his house.
In the meantime, this was in the identical month when the Federal Excessive Court docket in Abuja designated IPOB as a terrorist organisation below the Terrorism Act.
The court docket finally revoked Kanu’s bail in 2019 and the trial choose, Justice Binta Nyako, ordered the IPOB chief’s rapid arrest.
Over a month in the past, the Lawyer Basic of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), introduced that Kanu had been rearrested.
The IPOB chief was subsequently charged to court docket once more and remanded within the custody of the DSS – till July 26 when he was speculated to be tried on the Federal Excessive Court docket in Abuja.
Nonetheless, Justice Nyako adjourned Kanu’s trial to October 21 as a result of failure of the DSS to supply him in court docket.
When the matter was referred to as up, the prosecution counsel, MB Abubakar, knowledgeable the court docket that the matter was slated for listening to and that they had been able to proceed.
However Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, knowledgeable the court docket that there was a pending utility earlier than the court docket to switch Kanu from the custody of the DSS to a correctional centre.
Justice Nyako said that the trial couldn’t proceed within the absence of the IPOB chief since he was not obtainable to face his trial.
Ejiofor, the main counsel for Kanu, had advised the court docket that the DSS had denied him and the IPOB chief’s family the chance to see him.
“We’ve been denied entry to Kanu within the final 10 days. We’re nervous about his security and don’t know why the Federal Authorities refused to convey him to court docket,” he stated.
A member of Kanu’s authorized crew, Aloy Ejimakor, later claimed that the DSS gave “logistics difficulties” as causes for not producing the IPOB chief in court docket on Monday,
Quest for justice
Nkasi Wodu, a New Voices Fellow on the Aspen Institute and lawyer, primarily based in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, asserted that Kanu’s trial was a possibility for the Federal Authorities to counter IPOB’s divisive techniques.
He wrote on the Council on Overseas Relations weblog that many observers had been watching to see whether or not the federal government would keep on with its place and, in doing so, reinforce the IPOB propaganda that Igbo “won’t ever be handled pretty in a united Nigeria.”
“The style by which Kanu seems to have been kidnapped overseas already put stress on the federal government to indicate it is not going to mishandle the scenario in such a method that additional radicalises separatists and bolsters their ranks. The IPOB chief’s disappearance solely provides to that stress,” Wodu stated.
“To make certain, the president as commander-in-chief has a duty to discourage dissident agitations and to maintain the nation safe. However the authorities’s ongoing mishandling of IPOB and the trial of its chief is not going to serve these goals,” he argued.
Wodu stated one of the best ways for the federal government to indicate nearly all of the Igbo those that it represents their pursuits “is to start out with Nnamdi Kanu’s trial and to prosecute him in a method that’s thought-about truthful and equitable.”
Additionally, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mike Ozekhome, confused that Nigeria’s authorized system doesn’t admit secret trials, including that the place of the legislation was that each trial needs to be carried out in public and everybody entitled to look at the proceedings.
“For a trial to be free and truthful, Part 36 of the structure says it have to be carried out brazenly and publicly. Banning some media homes from protecting Nnamdi Kanu’s trial isn’t solely a sin towards Part 36 of the structure, however it additionally violently offends the availability of Part 22 of the identical structure which supplies the media the appropriate and duty to make sure that the provisions of Chapter Two of the structure coping with the elemental aims and directive ideas of state coverage are upheld and that the federal government is held accountable to the folks of Nigeria,” he stated.
The Head of Mission, Management & Accountability Initiative Nigeria, Mr Henry Protect, stated the nation was derailing from democratic values by suspending main media retailers from protecting Kanu’s trial.
“So journalists and media homes wishing to cowl court docket proceedings towards Nnamdi Kanu have to use to the DSS for accreditation? Like a media home wants the DSS permission to cowl proceedings of a court docket?” he requested, including, “Media homes don’t want accreditation in a court docket of legislation.”
Though this wouldn’t be the primary time the Nigerian authorities could be adopting secret trials for sure crimes and people, some political observers argued the offences Kanu is being tried for together with treason and terrorism required that he be tried brazenly.
A Lagos-based lawyer and social commentator, Olukunle Adebola, stated, “Kanu and IPOB are of curiosity to many events, so it’s only cheap that the federal government permits extra media homes to cowl the IPOB chief’s trial, not solely media homes which can be perceived to be partisan.
“Public trials enable most people to see that the justice system is functioning correctly and treating defendants pretty.
He added, “Nonetheless, in conditions that warrant secret trials, it have to be demonstrated that there’s a substantial likelihood that the defendant’s proper to a good trial will likely be prejudiced by publicity. However even at that, the defendant’s truthful trial rights have to be protected.”
All rights reserved. This materials, and different digital content material on this web site, might not be reproduced, revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in entire or partially with out prior categorical written permission from PUNCH.
Contact: [email protected]